Home Resources CS035 Fracture Flow
Case study
Diagnosing water production and resolving uncertainties in openhole multistage fracturing
True Flow Products Resource ID: CS035

Challenge

CS035 Fracture Flow log plot
Figure 1: Active frac ports and fracture distribution across all stages and three bypassed packers.

Solution

Fracture Flow is delivered by TGT’s analysts and engineers using the True Flow system with Chorus and Cascade platforms. Integrating insights from a Chorus acoustic survey and Cascade temperature and flow modelling with the production logs, OH logs and calculated rock mechanical properties provides a better understanding of the fracturing process, completion performance and production performance in an OH multistage fracturing completion.

 

Chorus acoustics and Cascade flow modelling provided a quantitative assessment of flowing fractures and stagewise production from the reservoir behind the liner.

 

Multi-array production logging results quantified the flow and flow profile inside the horizontal liner. The integration of datasets was conducted in a single deployment to deliver a comprehensive understanding of well completion and production, including clear identification of water-producing intervals.

CS035 Fracture Flow log plot
Figure 2: Flow geometry and contribution across the horizontal section.

Result

The Fracture Flow diagnostic programme evaluated the active fracture ports and fracture contribution in each stage. It also enabled the team to assess the packers, completion integrity, and production distribution behind the liner (Figure 1). Multi-array production logging was used to investigate the flow profile entering the liner.

 

The survey results identified 34 active fractures and showed that some flow was bypassing several packers. Figure 2 shows the reservoir flow profile provided by Cascade and the True Flow system. Most fractures were clustered around Stage 4 and Stage 5, and this had a major impact on production. Survey results revealed good completion integrity overall, with only three bypassed hydraulic packers. The dual packer isolation systems were shown to prevent communication between contributing stages.

 

Based on the comprehensive analysis result the water being produced from all fracture entry ports except Stage 5, where water contribution was minimal. Engineering work decreased the water–gas ratio to 5%.